JavaScript: Generators

Posted on July 19, 2016  (Last modified on October 23, 2022 )
5 minutes  • 915 words

One thing I’ve learned recently from Clojure (don’t worry, this post is about JavaScript) is that laziness is great. Lazy code is powerful code, allowing you to model things like infinite sequences or complex computations over a range of data. Without this laziness, an infinite sequence would cause a stack overflow or complex computations would bog down your performance when you may not even need to perform all those computations to begin with!

Enter Generators

With the latest rendition of JavaScript, developers now have access to tools to help them be lazy! Iterables and Generators. This post will cover generators, as I think they’re the most applicable out of the two, although they both are very similar. Generators let you define an algorithm for generating new values each time you request the next value from the generator. This allows us to do last-second computations or illustrate lists with infinite length.

Let’s go ahead and write a simple generator.

function* nameGenerator() {
  yield "Brad";
  yield "Jake";
  yield "Matt";

Simple enough, right? The two things to note here are function* and yield. The asterisk in the function definition tells us that we’re making a generator. Yield, on the other hand, it’s practically a return value except that when you call this .next() on this generator again, you’ll pick up where you last left off.

Invoking a generator function like you would a standard function will actually return a very different result. You may expect nameGenerator() to return 'Brad', but in fact, it will return a generator object. To get the first yielded value from the generator, we call next() on that generator. Let’s take a look at some code.

let names = nameGenerator();
// Brad
// Jake
// Matt

You’ll notice that we’re actually printing the value property of the result of calling next(). That’s because next() actually returns an object with a value and a done property. Once the generator is out of values to yield, the done property will be true and the generator will not yield more values.

A More Complex Example

Alright, I guess that’s cool, right? Generators really shine once you’re doing something complex, or something that could cause – say – a stack overflow if you’re processing it all at once. What would an generator look like that counted up to infinity? Something like this:

function* infiniteRange() {
  var i = 0;
  while (true) yield i++;

let infinity = infiniteRange();

infinity will never be completed. When we call next() we’re going to keep getting the next number in the list of real numbers. How cool is that?! We can finally evaluate sequences lazily in JavaScript!

More on next()

next() is the bread and butter of a generator, but there’s more to it than you’ve seen so far. next() actually accepts a parameter that replaces the yielded value. So if I have a statement yield i, and I trigger that yield via a next(), then call next('foo'), foo will replace the yield i in the generator. This sounds a bit confusing but hopefully this example will clear things up.

function* passBack() {
  let a = yield 1;

let noPassBack = passBack();
let yesPassBack = passBack();; //We yield the value 1;
// Object {value: 1, done: false}; //We dont pass anything back
// undefined; // We yield the value 1;
// Object {value: 1, done: false}"foo"); //We pass 'foo' back
// foo

Need a practical example? Let’s say we’re using promises. If you get a promise from next(), you can evaluate the promise and pass the value back into the generator using the following next(). This means you can essentially write generators to model code synchronously, but use the generator in an asynchronous fashion. Personally, I feel like this helps keep your main logic very clean, while delegating to the generator for the ugly asynchronous pieces.

Returning a Generator

By far, the most practical use for me has been creating generators via a function. Here’s a very simple example, but I think it can show you how powerful it can actually be!

 * Returns a generator for a given range of values.
function range(n, l) {
  let start = l ? n : 0;
  let limit = l ? l : n;

  return (function* rangeGenerator() {
    for (var i = start; i <= limit; i++) {
      yield i;

let oneToTen = range(1, 10);
// {value: 1, done: false}
// 2

By now, you should have noticed that these generators are acting a lot like iterables. In fact, if you crawl up the prototype on a generator object, you’ll see that they actually inherit from Symbol.iterator. This means we can actually use them as we would iterables.

let reduce = 0;
for (let i of range(5)) {
  reduce += i;
// 15

Perhaps you’re familiar with the latest Ecmascript standards and, specifically, the spread operator. You can actually use those on generators too!

// 0 1 2 3 4 5

Are Generators the next great thing?

They’re certainly a great thing, but I don’t think they’re the next great thing. Mastering them could be very powerful, but the use cases for them might not be as vast as we can hope for. That being said, I believe that they’re a unqiue tool to help solve a lot of challenging problems in the world of JavaScript. What do you think? Let me know below!

Cartoon headshot of Brad Cypert
Follow me

Connect with me to follow along on my journey in my career, open source, and mentorship. Occasionally, I'll share good advice and content (quality not guaranteed).