<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Multimethods on BradCypert.com</title>
    <link>https://www.bradcypert.com/tags/multimethods/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Multimethods on BradCypert.com</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2022 18:41:15 -0400</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.bradcypert.com/tags/multimethods/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Mighty Morphing Multimethods</title>
      <link>https://www.bradcypert.com/mighty-morphing-multimethods/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.bradcypert.com/mighty-morphing-multimethods/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Type systems are a tricky thing. A lot of languages have very flexible type systems, such as F# with its inferred (and extremely well inferred at that) type system, or JavaScript with it’s untyped nature. Clojure hits a happy middle ground (for me, at least) – It’s dynamically typed (or “gradually typed”, if that’s your cup of tea).&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Why is the typing important? Polymorphism. Most of you probably learned polymorphism from your introduction to object-oriented programming course/book which was probably in C++ or Java. While it’s true, polymorphism is blatantly obvious in OOP, it’s still a thing in functional languages, too. Clojure, considering it runs on the JVM as well, is certainly no exception. Today we’re going to talk about Multimethods, a particular form of runtime polymorphism. And since I’m in a playful mood, our example is going to involve Power Rangers.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
