<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Map on BradCypert.com</title>
    <link>https://www.bradcypert.com/tags/map/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Map on BradCypert.com</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2022 22:25:45 -0500</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.bradcypert.com/tags/map/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Understanding Clojure&#39;s Map &amp; PMap</title>
      <link>https://www.bradcypert.com/understanding-clojures-map-pmap/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.bradcypert.com/understanding-clojures-map-pmap/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Let’s be honest – Part of the reason you’re using Clojure is the higher order functions like &lt;code&gt;map&lt;/code&gt;. They’re great, composable, and describe what you’re trying to do instead of defining what to do – this keeps code simple. Maybe you’ve been playing with &lt;code&gt;map&lt;/code&gt; for a while now and have even tried using &lt;code&gt;pmap&lt;/code&gt;. If you did, you probably noticed that &lt;code&gt;pmap&lt;/code&gt; is often slower than &lt;code&gt;map&lt;/code&gt;, and if you want to know why – read on.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
