<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Fsharp on BradCypert.com</title>
    <link>https://www.bradcypert.com/tags/fsharp/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Fsharp on BradCypert.com</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2022 17:29:45 -0400</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.bradcypert.com/tags/fsharp/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>5 Programming Languages You Should Really Try</title>
      <link>https://www.bradcypert.com/5-programming-languages-you-could-learn-from/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.bradcypert.com/5-programming-languages-you-could-learn-from/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;For some strange reason, the vast majority of my blog readers are Python Developers. I wrote two articles on Python a long time ago and honestly try to avoid python when I can. So here’s an article for you purveyors of Python — you sultans of snakes.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Note: This article is still likely relevant even if you’re not a Pythonista&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;For those who aren’t aware, Linguistics and Grammars are particularly interesting to me. I really, really enjoy looking into new languages and comparing them to what I already know. Originally, this started as a purely syntactic thing, but as I learned more about compilers, virtual machines, and performance I started to compare those as well. We’ll cover a little bit of everything in this post as I suggest a few great languages that you’ve probably not tried yet. I’ll count down in terms of favorites:&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
